Therefore , on the problem of substantive law , firstly , constructive fault liability should be adapted in civil liability of inside dealing 因此,在實(shí)體法問題上,首先,內(nèi)幕交易的民事責(zé)任應(yīng)當(dāng)采用過錯(cuò)推定責(zé)任。
The constructive fault and limited liability principle about the civil liability of asset accreditation agency are restated in law of corporation , which is revised in 2005 , but there are many problems that must be researched thoroughly 2005年修訂的《公司法》從法律上明確了驗(yàn)資機(jī)構(gòu)民事責(zé)任的推定過錯(cuò)原則和有限責(zé)任原則,然而有許多問題還需要進(jìn)一步澄清。
The third chapter mainly focuses on the civil indemnity liability originating from the securities manipulation . to begin with , the first part ascertains that such kind of torts generally trepasses on the object of so - called " pure economic interest ' mn next part , it demonstrates in detail the requisites with which would incur a civil damage liability . regarding the fault ( including both intention and negligence ) , it put forward a viewpoint that we should impose the civil liability upon manipulations of chinese securities market on the basis of constructive fault principle . about the question of iniuria ( wrong ) , the author studies two aspects , one is assumption of risk , the other is the model of determining iniuria and solutions proposed 其中第一節(jié)首先明確了操縱市場這種侵權(quán)行為的客體即所謂“純粹財(cái)產(chǎn)上利益” 。第二節(jié)具體闡明了操縱市場行為民事賠償責(zé)任的構(gòu)成要件。在過錯(cuò)部分提出要以推定過失責(zé)任原則為基礎(chǔ)追究我國證券市場操縱行為的民事責(zé)任,違法部分研究了自甘冒險(xiǎn)行為和違法認(rèn)定模式及對策兩個(gè)問題,其中違法認(rèn)定模式是一個(gè)創(chuàng)新,對改變我國目前證券市場民事索賠必須先由證監(jiān)會(huì)認(rèn)定違法的機(jī)制給予了批判。
The chapter suggests that chinese securities laws apply the imputable doctrine of liability for faults as a general principle . in order to facilitate lawsuits in favor of the investors who suffer from misrepresentation , the constructive faults doctrine and the objective standard of faults shall be generally applied 本章認(rèn)為,欺詐市場理論為投資者權(quán)益保護(hù)提供了有力的支持,我國證券法可以借鑒欺詐市場理論,在責(zé)任成立因果關(guān)系問題上采取舉證責(zé)任倒置的方法,為保護(hù)投資者合法權(quán)益掃清障礙。
This paper discussed constructive fault principle when it clarified connotation of “ unreal asset accreditation ” ; it clarified that the cause is neglecting the particularity of asset accreditation , on the basis of analyzing the legislation , justice and theory about the civil liability of asset accreditation agency 本文在澄清“驗(yàn)資不實(shí)”的內(nèi)涵的過程中論述了驗(yàn)資機(jī)構(gòu)民事責(zé)任的推定過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則;在對以往驗(yàn)資機(jī)構(gòu)民事責(zé)任的立法、司法及理論進(jìn)行分析的過程中,論證了問題的癥結(jié)在于忽略了驗(yàn)資自身的特殊性。